The Kmer Rouge Genocide - 626 Words

History always repeats itself. From world wars to economic slumps and even genocides, there is always evil and corruption present where the goal is to obtain power. In order to claim power, evil must oppress the innocent, even if the innocent attempts to break loose, evil continues to push down. An example of evil’s oppression is the genocide that occurred in the 1970’s. A communist group known as the Khmer Rouge invaded Cambodia to transform its society into a communist agrarian society (Cambodian Genocide). The Khmer Rouge believed that all Cambodians must work as one huge federation of collective farmers. Anyone who opposed this was killed. If anyone questioned what the Khmer Rouge was doing, didnt work or showed any emotion, they were killed. The Khmer Rouge wanted equality among the people. The Khmer Rouge also questioned its own members, and frequently executed members for suspicions of treason. Survival in Cambodia was determined by one’s ability to wo rk. Therefore, Cambodia’s elderly, handicapped, ill, and children suffered. If someone wore glasses, they were considered an intellectual who would cause trouble and therefore was killed. If they had a watch, they were considered wealthy and killed (McCormick). Before that in 1934, a rival to Stalin, Sergey Kirov, was murdered. Stalin was accused of being behind the assassination, and he used this as an excuse to arrest thousands of people. Who, in his words, â€Å"could have been responsible for Kirovs murderShow MoreRelatedThe Cold War Of Europe And North America2106 Words   |  9 Pagesmeasures be taken to prevent further communist expansion in Southeast Asia’’. The adversaries of the USSR perceived the Soviet’s influence in Asia as a imminent threat grew, with the example of the Formosa strait crisis in 1954 to 1955 or in Cambodia Kmer Rouge taking Phnom Penh in April 1975. If the USA showed resentment towards imperialism, the concern surrounding Ho Chi Minh’s takeover on the south of Vietnam, converting the entire country to communism far outweighted the self-determination ideal. To

An Argument Against Drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife Reserve Free Essays

An Argument against Drilling in the Alaskan National Wildlife Reserve By: James Andrew Whitten Government Economics Heath Vincent March 5, 2013 America’s rank as the world’s leading superpower gives the nation unsurpassed clout throughout the rest of the world, but as the old saying goes â€Å"With great power comes great responsibility. † Many other nations not only rely on America’s economy for their own country’s survival, but they also look up to America with a hopeful sense for the future. The founding fathers of this great nation had excellent insight into the authority that America would one day possess, and thus they attempted to set many precedents that would lead the way for the nations that would choose to follow America’s example. We will write a custom essay sample on An Argument Against Drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife Reserve or any similar topic only for you Order Now Still today, every move that the American nation makes is carefully scrutinized by the other nations of the world. So, it is crucial that the United States ensure that as it moves forward, it does so with a noble and future oriented perception of its goals. Thus, drilling for oil in the Alaskan National Wildlife Reserve would be a colossal mistake for the United States, because drilling would be detrimental to the pristine indigenous environment, it would have little or no beneficial impact on the American or Global economy, and would poorly exemplify the ambitions that America should have. For the past century, the global dependency on oil has progressively increased each and every year. Now, the world’s need for a steady oil supply is at an all-time high, but oil supplies are slowly dwindling day by day. Oil prices have sky rocketed, the environment has been irreversibly damaged, and it is evident that this rate of oil consumption is completely unsustainable. So should America not be avidly searching for new sustainable alternatives to oil, rather than attempting to destroy land set aside for the very purpose of protecting it against such damaging procedures as oil drilling? The Alaskan National Wildlife Reserve (ANWR) is one of the many wildlife preservation efforts that great men in America’s past developed in order to preserve both the natural beauty of this great land, and the natural environment and its resources. Humans are one of the few species that contribute nearly nothing to ecosystem in which they live, yet they devour gargantuan amounts of the resources around them. Gasoline is an excellent example of this. Americans are consistently obliterating the ozone layer through their emission of toxic pollutants from the gas they use every day in their cars. Yet, rather than address the unmaintainable way of living they have adopted by attempting to lower their consumption, they just expect more gas. The American government should not allow this mindset to continue, and should aid its people in having a better understanding of their effect on the environment. This same greed carries directly over into the economic side of this situation too. Rather than accepting that ANWR only has enough oil resources to last for six months if the nation were to rely solely on it, and that the oil drilled would at the very most impact the oil price by three percent, Americans fool themselves into believing that ANWR can offer economic salvation. The American people would like to believe that this oil will release the country from its unhealthy dependence on foreign oil, but the fact is there is nowhere near enough oil there to have any such affect. And, the only people who will find true economic gain from the oil will be the oil companies. Instead of being blinded by greed, America should fix the real problem, the inflated consumption of oil by the American people. Finally, as previously stated, many nations admirably look up to America’s great influence in hope of a better future for their own nation. America should utilize this power to ensure that other nations also follow in a direction that will lead the world to a future that this current generation can take pride in. Drilling in the Alaskan National Wildlife Preserve would have the exact opposite effect. By drilling in ANWR, America would be making a statement that it is perfectly acceptable to further destroy the world’s unstable environment all for the sake of greed. It would set a pattern that said no matter the circumstances of the area, no matter that it is a safe haven for animal breeding, and no matter that the people of the world need o truly reflect on the rate of their oil consumption, it is acceptable to drill anywhere that oil is found. Would the American people have been so ready to drill if the refinery were going to be in Yellowstone and the magnificent Sequoias would have to be demolished? No, it would be an abomination to even consider, and so the same mentality should be set for ANWR. Americans have always taken an abundant pride in their country. The founding fathers of the mighty nation developed a country that is far beyond what anyone could have imagined two-hundred years ago. However, they too realized that all resources are not infinite and that there is great need to protect certain pieces of land for the sake of the future. Thus, they developed national wildlife reserves in the hope of setting aside land specifically for the purpose of preservation. The American nation needs to remember this, and maintain the ideals of those who came before them by looking to the future, not just the present. ANWR is meant for conservation, not more devastation. How to cite An Argument Against Drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife Reserve, Essays

Valuation of Airthread Brief free essay sample

Define the problem Problem that both ACC and ATC faced Problem for American Cable Communication (ACC) 1. The most severe problem for ACC is the increasing in competitors with the trend toward bundle of services. Recently, Incumbent local exchange carriers (ILEC’s) which is the firm that normally provide wireless service are expanding its products. ILEC’s is growing their video offerings which is the major product of ACC. We believe that this problem require very quick response from Robert Zimmerman, senior vice president of business development, as the technology is continue developing all the time, so ACC should acquire ATC to provide and develop more services. 2. In addition, ACC saw a looming competitive threat from advance wireless networks based on 802. 16n standard for mobile WiMAX. Those networks are expected to offer not only wireless telephony but also internet service which is also the main product of ACC. Problem for AirThread Connections (ATC) 1. We will write a custom essay sample on Valuation of Airthread Brief or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page ATC faced a cost disadvantage relative to its main wireless competitors owned by ILEC’s. High operating cost is resulted from moving traffic from cell towers to central switching offices using either landlines leased from competitors or technically cumbersome microwave equipment. This is the most critical problem for ATC, according to Michael Balistreri, the company’s CFO, he said â€Å"In a commoditized industry, it is usually the low-cost producer that survives and thrives†. . Moreover, ATC’s competitors offer more products apart from wireless service which are landline, videos, and internet service. These lead to higher customer acquisition and retention costs, plus slower growth. Assumptions from ACC’s acquisition 1. Both companies could help each other compete in an intensely competitive industry that requires more and more bundle service offerings so the revenue of both companies will be increased. 2. A study done by Rubinstein amp; Ross estimated that ATC can save about 20% in backhaul cost by using ACC fiber lines instead of leasing landlines from other companies. However, Ms. Zhang believes that the cost savings would be gradual. Therefore, she estimated the total system operating cost saving to be 6% realized over four years beginning in 2009. 3. By acquisition, both companies will expand the business market which could have increased the stability and reliability of the company’s revenues. Moreover, each firm will increase its network utilization and increase cost efficiency as a result.